Candy Tooth: The Return #1 evaluate: A Twin Peaks-like sequel at DC Comics

In Jeff Lemire and José Villarrubia’s Candy Tooth, Cormac McCarthy’s The Street meets The Island of Dr. Moreau. Set a decade after a plague had killed off most of humanity, the 40-issue DC/Vertigo sequence adopted a sheltered boy named Gus with deer antlers rising out of his head, in addition to his protector and travelling companion, a violent older man named Jeppard, as they explored an American wasteland.

Candy Tooth reached a pure finish level with its 40th situation in 2013, however this yr its creators are again with Candy Tooth: The Return. The primary installment of the six-issue miniseries provides a meta-textual layer to the plot of the unique comedian, and stands to deepen Candy Tooth’s themes of faith and storytelling.

Who’s making Candy Tooth: The Return?

This isn’t a case of mental property falling into new fingers: Jeff Lemire is again writing and penciling Candy Tooth: The Return and José Villarrubia is again because the colorist. Since Sweeth Tooth put him on the map, Lemire has written for Marvel titles like All-New Hawkeye and Outdated Man Logan. José Villarrubia is a colorist whose most constant comics title was the primary Candy Tooth, however had additionally labored on Alan Moore’s Promethea.

What’s it about?

A boy with antlers vaults over a fallen log in a forest, in Sweet Tooth: The Return #1, DC Comics (2020).

Picture: Jeff Lemire, José Villarrubia/DC Comics

An 11-year-old youngster with deer antlers has been having odd desires of an indignant man and issues that exist past the forest surrounding his dwelling. The boy’s “father” has at all times advised him that he’s the final of the Hybrids, individuals who had been half human, half animal, and it’s his place to “be free and have enjoyable till it’s time to go to heaven.” However the boy is starting to suspect that these are lies.

Why now?

Lemire should have seen Twin Peaks: The Return, David Lynch’s 18-episode companion piece to the early-’90s tv present. When this new Candy Tooth was introduced, he cribbed the precise tweet language that David Lynch used to announce his new Twin Peaks season. Simply as Lynch introduced again his present as one thing that had the acquainted gamers however was altogether totally different, Candy Tooth: The Return is sequel, reboot, and its personal factor suddenly.

The primary used storytelling as one among its direct themes, with the tales that characters advised one another over a campfire about their very own previous rising to grow to be widespread fables that shelter a pearl of fact — or grand dogmatic perception programs. This enables The Return to have an additional layer of plot for these which might be to see what’s going to be remixed. The primary character claims to know the distinction between a narrative he’s advised and a fact he can really feel.

At first look, it might seem as if the 2 sequence are telling the identical general story, however the satan is within the particulars relating to fables and deciphering scriptures. If there’s a refreshing distinction between Candy Tooth and The Return, it’s that human society seems to be damaged in several method this time round. It’s not that the mass illness and local weather change of the primary sequence doesn’t hit as laborious because it did in 2009 (it hits more durable), however for lots of comedian e-book readers, this new, “extra civilized” state of evil is extra instant and one thing the characters have extra company with.

Is there any required studying?

Studying the primary Candy Tooth sequence, all 40 (glorious) problems with it, is a should. At first look, The Return begins precisely the identical method as Candy Tooth. Lemire’s pencils and Villarrubia’s colour work attempt to keep on with the layouts and appears of the final run. Some pages in The Return #1 even mirror pages in Candy Tooth #1.

It additionally wouldn’t damage to pay attention to what Twin Peaks: The Return is, in case you missed it airing on Showtime. Lemire advised Leisure Weekly again in 2018 that he had been “obsessed” with Twin Peaks for the reason that starting of the sequence. Lemire would make visitor appearances on podcasts discussing Twin Peaks, he commissions Twin Peaks artwork, and he makes his personal. Making an attempt to digest and decode all of Twin Peaks: The Return is an deliberately not possible project, however each Twin Peaks’ and Candy Tooth’sReturns” function a protagonist the viewers acknowledges regardless that the character doesn’t appear to know who or what he’s.

However primarily concern your self with the primary Candy Tooth. The allusions to the notoriously nebulous Twin Peaks means we might keep away from retreading any floor lined within the unique sequence in The Return, just like the Hybrid’s origins, which was a central solved thriller of the primary run. It could seem like this time round is a retread on the floor, besides the primary web page of The Return #1 says “300 Years Later…” and if you wish to know from what level you jumped 300 years into the longer term, the reply is in Candy Tooth.

Is Candy Tooth: The Return good?

An older man looks sternly at the camera, with a narration box that says “The Big Man. He’s just looking at me with those cold eyes.” in Sweet Tooth: The Return #1, DC Comics (2020).

Picture: Jeff Lemire, José Villarrubia/DC Comics

In a binary, Candy Tooth: The Return is sweet. It’s nice to have each Lemire and Villarrubia returning to their roles. Followers of the unique sequence will acknowledge the character designs they’re alleged to and can puzzle over the small print. The model of the writing in The Return calls again to Candy Tooth, utilizing the inner monologue of the primary character to set the scene in plain language, however the artwork exhibits that this world is solely separate from the unique. For instance, as a substitute of ultimately realizing that the protagonist resides in an deserted wildlife protect fairly than some form of Eden, readers of the brand new sequence will immediately discover the antler’d boy of this story lives in unusual circumstances. If you happen to learn the primary Candy Tooth, you would possibly suppose you’ve gotten an concept of the place The Return goes, however there are creepy additions like the brand new “father” that we haven’t seen on this storyworld earlier than.

If there’s a possible pitfall to how Candy Tooth: The Return is approaching the fabric, it might be taking part in it at little too secure. The primary situation rehashes what labored with the unique and throws in artistic new concepts. Lemire and Villarrubia need to preserve strolling that line: If The Return doesn’t play sufficient of the hits, will probably be disappointing. If The Return strays too removed from the unique’s concept, it’ll have been meaningless to tarnish Candy Tooth’s status with it.

One panel that popped

“Good boy. Now go and wash up. It is time for your lessons,” says a pale, red-eyed man in a red robe, cupping the chin of a boy with deer antlers in Sweet Tooth: The Return, DC Comics (2020).

Picture: Jeff Lemire, José Villarrubia/DC Comics

Lemire’s traces are nearer to cartoonist than draftsman, speaking the essential feelings of the panel with out defining lots of element. However like the perfect cartoonists, if he wants to tug the main focus in, he is aware of how. One thing could be very mistaken right here, and it’s not the lovable wanting child with antlers. The crimson garb of “the daddy” pops out of the muted colours of the remainder of the setting within the early pages, and one thing is critically mistaken with this man. He has a pores and skin situation and bolts popping out of his neck. He’s acquired some critical Snoke-face. One can at all times depend on Villarrubia bringing the colour, however the economic system of this twin profile panel is Lemire succeeding at one thing he doesn’t frequently try.


Vox Media has affiliate partnerships. These don’t affect editorial content material, although Vox Media might earn commissions for merchandise bought through affiliate hyperlinks. For extra info, see our ethics coverage.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *